|
With establishment of Serbian clerical government
and with triumphal auto-litanies (church processions held by forming
line of automobiles due to the epidemiological situation caused by
COVID19) waving Serbian flags and with outcries “This is Serbia”,
grand Serbian clerical-Nazism won an important battle in their fight
for turning Montenegro into ‘Serbian land’. However, this is just
the first step, this is the beginning and not the end of the process
of converting Montenegro into Serbian land, and there are numerous
difficulties and challenges on this path yet. Final success and
achievement of the charted strategic plan will depend mostly on
three factors: relation between three ‘winning’ coalitions,
preparedness of the (Montenegrin) sovereign forces to contravene
plans of clerical Nazism, as well as on further relation of the
Western diplomacy, primarily the European Union, towards the idea
and practice to convert Montenegro into Serbian land and creation of
the ‘Serbian world’.
Regarding the relation among ‘winners’, it may be
said that it mostly resembles relation among poker players where
each and every one of them aspires to deceive the others, and at the
same time they are united solely by the equal wish to win.
Coalition “For the future of Montenegro” (Za
budućnost Crne Gore), and its main partner Democratic Front (DF –
Demokratski front, coalition of disparate pro Serbian right wing
parties), shows clear intention for the other two partners to be
used for achievement of their strategic goals, that is to change
foreign policy orientation of the country, change of state symbols
and withdrawal of recognition of (the former Serbian province of)
Kosovo. Assuredly, in the DF they are aware that they are not able
to achieve all their goals immediately and that they have to act
gradually using parliamentary majority provided to them by URA
(United Reform Action) and Democrats (Demokrate) which will be
rejected or absorbed as soon as DF, by the population census
(announced for next year), instalment of their personnel ‘in depth’,
that is in state authorities and public companies, and with plenty
of financial and logistical help from Serbia, be capable to form
government and become equally dominant political party in Montenegro
as Serbian Progressive Party (Srpska napredna stranka) is in Serbia.
The question, would unification with Serbia will
be done or if Montenegro would formally remain independent is rather
side issue. Maybe it will show that it is more useful and more
convenient for the purpose of fooling bureaucracy in Brussels to
remain two states instead of one. Handicap to this plan is that the
DF, in a short period of time, has lost two of their fanatical
leaders, (Bishop) Amfilohije (leader of the Serbian Ortodox Church
in Montenegro) and (Patriarch) Irinej (Head of Serbian Ortodox
Church) together with departure of Trump and his uneducated
diplomats will significantly weaken right-wing tendencies in the
world and in Europe. However, on the other side, these facts will
lead concentration of commanding authorities in only one person, in
Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić as a leader of the “Serbian
world”, therefore there will be no misunderstandings in
communication any more.
URA (United Reform Action) also has the same
goals. They also want to use DF for the purpose of obtaining the
power and then to push it to the margins, which it has already done
in part by preventing its greedy leaders to overtake important
minister positions. However, the main ambition of URA is overtaking
electorate of the Democratic Party of Socialist (DPS – Demokratska
partija socijalista), and to send the party and (its leader Milo)
Đukanović into the archive (mozda naci nesto drugo npr. engleski
izraz: ‘send Djukanovic to Coventry’) therefore gathering around it
the whole sovereign block that would turn it to the leading party.
It is rather possible that this ambition will not be achieved
because strutting Abazović and other leaders of the URA already
resented sovereign block hardly with their inconsiderateness.
Regarding foxy Democrats of Aleksa Bečić, acting
commitment towards Europe on the state level, whilst practicing
great Serbian nationalism locally, their plan, based on saying
“while two argue, the third rejoices”, is to fuel conflicts between
URA and DF in order to present themselves as the only force that,
whilst on their European path, protects national interests, and
which is, therefore, the only one capable to reconcile what should
be irreconcilable – Europe and great Serbian clerical nationalism.
Regardless of the outcome of this family dispute
in the new government, its victory more and more resembles Pyrrhic
victory whereby its congenital, genetic contradictions become more
and more obvious.
The very first contradiction and discrepancy
consists in the fact that the winning forces, despite lychantropic
hatriot towards those they defeted (DPS), even before they came to
power, signed the agreement that they will not change main
achievements of DPS. Such act has never been seen in parliamentary
practice before and it clearly indicates the reason for demise of
DPS is not political but rather ideological in character, that DPS
was not toppled because it did not work well, because it was not a
‘good government’ by definition of classical political theory (I
would delete: ‘by definition of classical political theory) (which
is the only legitimate reason for a change of government), but
because it was ‘theirs’ (DPS’s)– antifascist, secular and
multi-ethnic and in which, as stated by the great Serbian clerical
fascists, Turks (pejorative for Bosnians), Shqiptars (pejorative for
Albanians) and Ustashas (Croatians) run the show. (mozda bi bilo
dobro da refraziramo ovu recenicu ili podijelimo na dvije: tacka iza
‘ideological in caracter’?)
The other paradox of the new government is that
its very victory, achieved on the wings of clerical rebellion,
eliminated the main reason for such rebellion: (new) law on
religious communities and freedom of religion. Today, it is clear to
anyone except for persuaded (mora da postoji bolja rijec u engleskom
za ‘nabedjen’, koja je druga rijec za to u srpskom?) Belgrade
‘political analysts’, that this law is in compliance with the
highest legal and political standards and that the reason for
rebellion against it has nothing to do with the law but only with
the ideology. Clerical rebellion under the slogan ‘we don’t give
(our) sanctuaries” (‘Ne damo svetinje’) was not rebellion against
any kind of injustice and it has nothing to do with the law but it
was classical political rebellion aimed at winning the power.
Now, when the power has been won and when
Montenegro became, or it is on the path to become a part of the
‘Serbian World’, it does no longer matter if the formal and legal
titular of the church properties will be the state, as is the case
in other countries as well, because such properties in any case
remain in ‘our’ hands (in Montenegro). Due to this, the new
government would love the most to leave such law just as it is, but
due to the noise it raised against the ‘unjust’ law it is compelled
to make changes of any kind.
The third discrepancy in which the new government
has found itself relates to the relation between religion and
epidemic of Corona virus. Under the parole, created by the Belgrade
clero-fascist ‘political analysists’, that DPS government is
conducting ‘identity genocide’ on Serbs in Montenegro, thesis of the
darkest religious fanatism has been smuggled which caused rapid
increase in the infected and diseased in Montenegro and in Serbia.
Thesis of the infatuated religious mystics, such as the (new) Prime
Minister (of Montenegro) Krivokapić himself, that Korona virus
cannot harm those “infected with the love of God”, that Communion of
thousands of people with the same spoon and kissing a dead person
(remains of Bishop Amfilohije) do not represent harm for the health,
in addition to mass and malice disrespect of the measures of
protection, in which one of the leaders was new Minister of Health
Borovinić, lead to the collapse of the health condition of the
population as well as the healthcare system.
The fact that now (suddenly) church in Montenegro
calls for respect of healthcare measures prescribed by the previous
government and purchase of thousands of plastic spoons for the
Communion, presents their hypocritical mentality.
Regarding further behavior of the European Union
towards the Serbian clerical nationalism and its project of creation
of the ‘Serbian World’, there are certain opinions that the EU
perceived the quintessence of the events in Montenegro and that the
correction of its attitude towards it is currently taking place. We
should hope that this is the case, however the EU may not make
significant correction unless it makes thorough analysis of what
happened and behavior of its representatives carried away by the
atmosphere of primitive ‘Trumpism’.
Namely, one careful analysis would indicate great
similarities between conquering Montenegro and Anschluss of Austria
conducted by the Nazi Germany. Certainly, when compared with the
Anschluss, operation in Montenegro seems to be miniature and
theatrical, however dimensions of the phenomenon are not as
important as their spiritual identity.
In both of these operations, starting and core
point was the statement that it is one and the same nation which
therefore should be united into one country. In the first out of 25
program points of the National – Socialist Workers’ Party of Germany
as of 1924 it is clearly written as follows: “We demand the union of
all Germans to form the Greater Germany on the basis of the people’s
right to self-determination”. Or, as controversial Nikšić (town in
Montenegro) businessman Daka Davidović, the great benefactor of the
Serbian Orthodox church and war criminal Radovan Karadžić, would put
it: “we want to renew Dušan’s (medieval Serbian Tsar) kingdom“.
Hitler in the Mein Kampf, talking about union with Austria, set up a
firm dogma that: ‘The same blood belongs to the common country“,
which is irresistibly reminiscent to the parole “Montenegro and
Serbia that is one family” written on one of the central viaducts in
Belgrade.
In compliance with these doctrinated standpoints,
on March 12th 1938, invasion of Austria was conducted, and on the
next day the German government adopted the law in which first
article stated that “Austria is the country of the German Reich”,
which is identical to the statement of the current Minister of
Foreign Affairs of Serbia Nikola Selaković, that Montenegro is
‘Serbian country’, or with the main thesis of the Serbian Orthodox
church that there is no Montenegrin nation and that these are Serbs
that are, as stated by the new (Montenegrin) Minister (of Culture)
in charge of converting Montenegrins to Serbs and (self proclaimed)
’woman Chetnik’ Vesna Bratić, turned into “Montenegrins(i)” by
‘ethnical engineering’.
Pursuant to the same expanding nationalism, Nazi
party was established in Austria, as ordered from Berlin, in July
1934. Thereby it attempted coup d’état there by killing the Austrian
Chancellor Dollfuss. By the same scenario, the Democratic Front in
Montenegro has been established and the attempt of coup d’état and
liquidation of Đukanović and other leaders of DPS occurred in 2016.
The identicalness of these two Anschlusses may be
perceived as well in the light of abundant logistic and financial
support from Germany and Serbia, and the fact that leaders of
Austrian Nazi Seyss-Inquart and leader of Sudeten Nazi Konrad
Henlein were frequent and rather privileged guests in Berlin, in the
same manner as leaders of Montenegro’s Democratic Front, Chetnik
‘Duke’ (Vojvoda) Andrija Mandić and militant Milan Knežević, who
even have at their disposal for such occasions the aircraft of the
government of Serbia, are (welcome) in Belgrade (ovo ‘in Belgrade’
je malo izgubljeno ovdje, zato sam dodao ‘welcome’ mozda takodje
dodati da stoga nije cudo sto je prva najavljena posjeta Krivokapica
upravo Njemackoj?)).
Finally, the identicalness of these two phenomena
may be seen in the relation of the Western diplomacy towards them.
Here, we will leave aside Trump and his people, such as Pompeo,
Grenell and (various)ambassadors in the Western Balkans, that caused
great harm to international relations, as well as “Trumpists” in
Europe, starting from Johnson, Salvini and Le Pen, to Poland,
Hungary and Bulgaria, who wholeheartedly supported Serbia in
conquering Montenegro: it is about that majority of liberal and
democratic Europe that, like Chamberlain and Daladier, silently
watched the most shameful propaganda led from Serbia against
Montenegro and the most devious hybrid war that led to the victory
of one ‘despiteful, unsightly right-wing’, to use the words of the
(film) director Goran Marković and formation of theocratic
government based on the middle-ages religious mysticism. Instead of
energetic confrontation to the aggression of the great Serbian
clerical nationalism, the European Union, just like Chamberlain, who
was glorified as a man that saved the peace on his return from
Munich, over its spokesperson Ana Pisonero, in the full swing of the
litany rampage and attacks to the very foundations of the country of
Montenegro, called “both parties” to seek compromise, criticized
(the former Government) Government of Montenegro about controlling
the media and stated that it is ‘looking forward’ to cooperation
with the new Government.
In a word, in the EU (did not realise) it is not
realized that in Montenegro it is not about standard change of
government, such as when Labour and Conservatives, or Christian
Democrats and Social Democrats swap places, but it is an authentic
clerical fascistic counter-revolution, one that initiated wars on of
disintegration of Yugoslavia and creation of Greater Serbia during
the 90s which ‘legitimately’ led to the genocide in Srebrenica; the
steps that followed were assassination of the Prime Minister (of
Serbia) Đinđić in 2003, adoption of several laws on rehabilitation
of Quisling Chetnik movement (2004 – 2011) and massive legal
rehabilitation of its members by the courts in Serbia, hiding and
glorification of war criminals as ‘Serbian knights’, only to enter
its final phase by aggression over Montenegro.
Therefore, there are more than sufficient elements
for a serious analysis of the previous events and behavior of the EU
and its representatives in the Western Balkans. It is not about the
EU taking sides in the conflicts among states, but to clearly state
that the Gables style campaign ( like statement that “Đukanović is
preparing massacre of Serbs in Montenegro”) is absolutely
inconsistent with the (Serbia’s?)candidacy for the membership in the
EU. If this was done, the events would take quite a different path.
The history is the teacher in life, but it is the
matter of capability for its messages and morals to be taken
properly.
Aleksandar Sekulović
|
