Report on
Land Mines 2002
FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA[1]
Key developments since May 2001: The Federal Republic
of Yugoslavia has initiated the process to accede to the Mine Ban
Treaty. FRY reported destruction of 90,000 stockpiled antipersonnel
mines from April 2001-May 2002, and has called for assistance to deal
with future stockpile destruction and mine clearance. FRY established a
mine action center in Belgrade in April 2002.
MINE BAN POLICY
Following the Federal Government's decision on 20
April 2001 to join the Mine Ban Treaty, preparations for accession were
launched by the Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs. In April 2002, the
Ministry said that the legislative proposal had been approved by the
Federal Ministries of Justice and Defense, and was before the Ministry
of Finance. The government will then adopt the proposal and forward it
to the Federal Assembly for adoption.[2]
In February 2002, the visiting Canadian Ambassador for
Mine Action, Daniel Livermore, was reported in a Belgrade newspaper as
expressing the belief based on his official contacts that the Federal
Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) would join the treaty by the end of
2002.[3] In March 2002, FRY's report to the Organization for Security
and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) stated that the "General Staff of the
YA [Yugoslav Army] believes that FRY should sign and ratify the 'Ottawa
Convention.'" Yugoslavia "is planning in the next period to sign and
ratify," and is also "supporting all the efforts that are directed to
the unique prohibition of antipersonnel mines and non-deviation of the
highest standards consisted in the [treaty]."[4]
The Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia has
claimed that the accession process has been unnecessarily delayed. It
organized a panel discussion on the Mine Ban Treaty on 6 June 2001,
which resulted in national media calls for progress on accession.[5]
At the June 2001 panel discussion, two representatives
of the Yugoslav Army said the Army would give up antipersonnel mines
only if replacement weapons were found and asserted that antipersonnel
mines remained an extremely important weapon in the defense system of
small countries.[6]
A Stability Pact mission in September 2001 said the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs was "very frank as to the reasons why they
could not yet accede," noting the need for donor assistance to meet the
four-year limit on stockpile destruction, and the "internal sensitive
political considerations to overcome in terms of public opinion about
the usefulness of APM for the protection of their borders from incursion
by non-state actors."[7]
FRY attended the Third Meeting of States Parties in
September 2001, in Managua, Nicaragua.[8] In its statement, FRY noted
that on 20 April 2001, it had decided in principle to accede to the Mine
Ban Treaty and would do so as soon as possible. But it also said
extremist groups were still using antipersonnel mines on Yugoslav
territory and that after accession, FRY would implement the treaty on
the territory under its control, but could not implement it on Yugoslav
territory not within its control. It noted that it would be difficult
and costly to complete stockpile destruction within the time limit
specified by the treaty, and substantial international assistance would
be needed for the clearance of mines and unexploded ordnance (UXO),
including cluster bombs. FRY saw itself as being at the start of a long
process.[9]
On 29 November 2001, FRY co-sponsored and voted in
favor of UN General Assembly Resolution 56/24M, calling for
universalization of the Mine Ban Treaty. FRY attended the intersessional
Standing Committee meetings in January and May 2002.[10] During the May
session, FRY also attended for the first time a meeting of the Reay
Group on Mine Action, which is part of the Stability Pact for South East
Europe.
FRY is a State Party to 1980 Protocol II, but not to
1996 Amended Protocol II to the Convention on Conventional Weapons
(CCW). It did not attend the Third Annual Conference of States Parties
to Amended Protocol II in December 2001. It did, however, attend the
Second CCW Review Conference in December 2001
PRODUCTION, TRANSFER AND STOCKPILING
In March 2002, FRY reported that it "is not producing
new mines, nor selling them to other countries and in the stockpiles
there are mines produced before 1990."[11] Military officials have
stated categorically that, since 1992, the Yugoslav military industry
has not produced landmines.[12] No information has been made publicly
available about the size and make-up of the stockpile of antipersonnel
mines.
In May 2002, FRY announced that since making the
decision in April 2001 to accede to the Mine Ban Treaty, FRY has
destroyed 90,000 antipersonnel mines, as an indication of its
commitment.[13]
On 27 September 2001, a Stability Pact mission visited
Belgrade, as part of an assessment in several Balkan countries of "the
technical options and future requirements for the destruction of APM
stockpiles in order to move towards realistic programs in this area in
keeping with international obligations." The mission was conducted for
the Reay Group on Mine Action, which forms part of Working Table III
(Security Issues) of the Stability Pact for South-East Europe. The
mission had expected that details of Yugoslav stockpiles would be given,
but this did not occur. It reported that it believes Yugoslavia to
possess the following types of antipersonnel mines: PMA 1, PMA 2, PMA 3,
PMR 2A, PMR 3, PP Mi Sr and PROM 1, but in "unknown quantities."[14] The
Ministry of Foreign Affairs explained later that the Ministry of Defense
did not wish to provide the information because the FRY was still not a
member of the Mine Ban Treaty and was, therefore, not obliged to do
so.[15]
The mission found that storage conditions for the
antipersonnel mines were good, but general explosives safety fell below
international standards.
USE
Landmine Monitor Report 2001 reported on use of
antipersonnel mines in the former Ground Safety Zone (GSZ) established
by NATO between Serbia and Kosovo.[16] Before Yugoslav forces entered
the buffer zone in late May 2001 in a NATO-approved operation, irregular
forces based there deployed mines and other explosive devices against
Serbian forces, including use in the municipalities of Bujanovac,
Preševo, Medveda and Kuršumlija. An article in a military journal
described the fear among farmers, and especially children, about mines
planted on village roads in Preševo municipality, and casualties from
antipersonnel mines.[17]
Mine incidents in southern Serbia have continued in
2001 and 2002, but it is unclear if these result from earlier deployment
or represent new use. The frequency of mine incidents appears to have
reduced in late 2001 and in 2002, as has the general level of
violence.[18] Press accounts identify at least three antipersonnel mine
incidents in 2001 (see Casualties section below).
The Ministry of Internal Affairs recorded a total of
34 incidents involving 109 mines and explosive devices in the southern
Serbian municipalities of Bujanovac, Preševo, Medveda and Kuršumlija
between 1 May 2001 and 5 March 2002.[19] In 15 cases, a total of 84
antipersonnel mines were found, all in the municipality of Bujanovac.
One mine exploded causing the death of one civilian and injury to
another, while the other 83 were deactivated and removed.
In addition, between 1 May 2001 and 5 March 2002, six
weapons caches were discovered in southern Serbia, which included 152
antipersonnel mines and 38 antitank mines.[20] On 23 July 2002, Serbian
police discovered a large cache of weapons including 150 mines in
Dobrosin village.[21]
LANDMINE/UXO PROBLEM
Information on the mine/UXO problem in FRY remains
incomplete. Different areas have been contaminated by mines and UXO in
several different periods of time. Northwestern areas bordering Croatia,
and the Montenegro/Croatia border, were mined in the early 1990s, by
Serbian forces including the Yugoslav Army. Southern and other border
areas were mined, to an unknown extent, by Serbian forces including the
Yugoslav Army in 1998 and 1999, in anticipation of a NATO land invasion.
Military and industrialized areas and communications centers were
targeted (including with cluster bombs) in the NATO air bombardment of
1999, resulting in UXO. Irregular forces based in the GSZ used
antipersonnel and antitank mines against Serbian forces, from 1999 until
at least mid-2001.
The Army General Staff states that records exist of
minefields placed by the Yugoslav Army, but not of minefields placed by
paramilitary forces. However, the Engineer Department of the General
Staff states that mined areas are known precisely, and that the areas
are marked. The General Staff has not yet authorized publication of this
information,[22] although FRY's OSCE report states that "FRY is ready to
make an exchange of the information considering the laid mines and
minefields...as the item of their destruction with countries that are
interested in this matter...and international humanitarian organizations
for mine actions."[23]
At a Stability Pact seminar in Croatia on 9-10 October
2001, two representatives from the Yugoslav Army described the problem
as "primarily one of UXO clearance but there were some areas that would
require the removal of mines."[24] According to the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs, unexploded cluster bomblets and other UXO from the NATO
bombardment in 1999 are scattered throughout inhabited areas, including
Belgrade, and the responsible bodies are still not familiar with all the
locations, and this represents a major threat to the civilian
population.[25]
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs compiled a report
which identifies six municipalities contaminated with unexploded cluster
bomblets, 31 municipalities contaminated with large aerial bombs, and 26
municipalities contaminated with mines and UXO from armed conflicts
prior to 1999.[26] At the Standing Committee meetings in May 2002, the
Yugoslav delegation presented this information, and added that the
estimated cost of clearance was ?1.2 million ($1,077,600).
Also in May, a representative of the NATO Partnership
for Peace (PfP) announced that a PfP Trust Fund program for FRY was
being planned, including projects to deal with antipersonnel mines
(sponsored by Canada), aerial UXO (sponsor undecided) and small
arms/light weapons (sponsored by the Netherlands). A preliminary visit
assessment was made in April 2002.[27]
From local sources it is known that, in Šid
municipality bordering Croatia, most of the mined areas are forests and
arable land, with the exception of Jamena village. Owners of arable land
in this village have been unable to cultivate their fields since
1991.[28]
MINE ACTION COORDINATION
A Stability Pact seminar on 9-10 October 2001
concluded that "the humanitarian demining program in FRY is in its
formative stages and the country could benefit considerably from the
experience of other countries in the region and the mine action
community as a whole."[29] According a report by UNOCHA in January 2002,
in southern Serbia "coordinated action aimed at mine clearance is
lacking. The JCB [Joint Coordinating Body of the Serbian and Federal
governments] insisted on taking over the coordination of this activity,
but have not initiated anything so far."[30]
However, the Yugoslav Mine Action Center was founded
on 7 March 2002, under the aegis of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. It
will invite open tendering by international and local organizations for
the clearance of mines, large-caliber aerial bombs and cluster bomb
units. International funding is required.[31]
MINE ASSESSMENT, CLEARANCE, AND FUNDING
In May 2001, representatives of the International
Trust Fund for Demining and Mine Victims Assistance (ITF) established by
Slovenia visited Yugoslavia. They discussed possible cooperation in
clearing contaminated areas on the Montenegro-Croatia border,
Serbia-Croatia border, in southern Serbia bordering Kosovo, and more
widespread UXO contamination resulting from the 1999 conflict. The ITF
had already received funds from Luxembourg and the Czech Republic for
operations in FRY.[32]
The ITF reports that in early May 2001 it funded the
Italian NGO Intersos to carry out an assessment of which clearance
projects could be conducted by Yugoslav authorities with ITF funding.
This assessment was funded by donations of the Czech Republic and United
States. The assessment prioritized clearance in the areas of Kopaonik,
Niš, Merdare, Bujanovac, Kopaonik II, Cacak-Kraljevo, Sjenica and
Vladimirovci, which are all described as UXO-contaminated, and clearance
of mines on the border with Croatia.[33] Intersos states that it carried
out an ITF-funded general survey in June and July 2001 to assess the
status and locations of mine and UXO contamination, especially cluster
bomb units, in FRY, and identified 14 contaminated locations. It made a
database from the information obtained.[34]
On 8 November 2001, FRY signed an agreement with the
ITF for cooperation in mine/UXO clearance. The first project involves
clearance of the Kopaonik area, for which training and equipping of
Yugoslav personnel started at the ITF center in Ig, Slovenia, in January
2002. The clearance operation was planned to start in April/May
2002.[35] The ITF will provide funding of DM300,000 (US$134,700). A
further project to be proposed for ITF funding is the clearing of
air-dropped ordnance at five locations in Belgrade and the immediate
vicinity. According to the Ministry for Internal Affairs, funds pledged
via the ITF for mine-related action in the Federal Republic of
Yugoslavia total around $2,500,000, donated by the US, the European
Union (EU) and others.[36]
On 14 November 2001, Serbian and Montenegrin
representatives attended a meeting of the South Eastern Europe Mine
Action Coordination Council in Tirana, Albania, and were accepted as
full members of the Council. An initiative was proposed for a regional
center for underwater demining based at Herceg Novi in Montenegro,
financed by the ITF and the republican government of Montenegro. The
center will offer its services to all interested countries in
Southeastern Europe, on a commercial basis.[37]
As of April 2002, the Yugoslav Army and Serbian
Interior Ministry had destroyed 727 pieces of UXO from the 1999
bombardment (missiles, aerial bombs, cluster bombs, mines, hand grenades
and other unknown items of UXO). It is estimated that this operation has
cost around ?697,000 ($626,000). Additionally, 3,120 pieces of UXO have
been located, which will require ?1,962,000 ($1.76 million) for
destruction.[38] In April/May 2001, the Yugoslav Army started
humanitarian mine clearance near Jamena (Šid municipality, near the
Croatian border). The operation was stopped for lack of funds.[39]
MINE RISK EDUCATION
UNOCHA reported in January 2002 that some mine risk
education activities had been run by the Joint Coordinating Body and by
international NGOs in southern Serbia.[40] The ICRC opened field offices
in the towns of Presevo and Bujanovac in late 2000 and started mine risk
education activities. With the easing of tensions in May 2001, local
activities and travel increased so the ICRC increased its activities in
order to reach more schoolchildren before the end of term. The ICRC
reported that "workshops were organized for Red Cross staff from the
municipalities bordering Kosovo, and new staff were employed to collect
data and assess the situation in villages affected by mines." To raise
the awareness of children in particular, two theatre companies (one
Serbian, one Albanian) were commissioned to perform a specially-adapted
play based on the Little Red Riding Hood fairy tale. From October 2001
to January 2002, the play was performed for some 10,000 children. At the
same time, mine awareness brochures were distributed to the audience and
village populations, and local TV and radio stations broadcast mine
awareness messages.[41]
Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) devised a
campaign focused on schoolchildren in Presevo municipality (including
refugee children from the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia). All
schools in the municipality were visited, and teachers were given
pamphlets used by the ICRC in Kosovo, and a Belgian document on mines
and UXO which was translated into Albanian and Serbian. MSF found that
most of the children were already well-informed about the danger of
mines and UXO. The campaign was extended to include schools in Bujanovac
municipality. Pamphlets were also distributed to the municipality
building, police, shops, and others to be made visible on the streets
and to be given to the remote areas of the municipalities.[42] The
campaign, which had a budget of approximately $20,000, closed down at
the end of 2001.[43]
LANDMINE/UXO CASUALTIES
According to the Ministry of Internal Affairs,
landmines and UXO caused 32 casualties in southern Serbia in 2001. Mines
and UXO killed 11 people (one Serb and four ethnic Albanian civilians
including two children, four members of the Serbian paramilitary police,
and two members of the Yugoslav Army) and injured 21 others (five ethnic
Albanian civilians including four children, seven policemen, and nine
soldiers). In 2000, five people were killed and 22 injured by landmines
or UXO. No incidents for 2002 were recorded up to March. The Ministry of
Internal Affairs report details each of these incidents, including the
circumstances and identities of those involved.[44]
In contrast, the ICRC records three people killed and
four injured in 2001; in 2000, five killed and six injured; and in 1999,
two people killed and two injured by mines.[45]
The risk of casualties may have been increased by the
return, in mid-2001, of some 5,300 people from Kosovo to southern
Serbia; many of these found inadequate housing and returned to Kosovo
later in 2001, with some returning to southern Serbia in 2002.[46]
According to media reports on antipersonnel mine
incidents: on 1 June 2001, a Serbian soldier stepped on an antipersonnel
mine near Lucani village (Bujanovac municipality), sustaining a serious
leg injury;[47] on 20 August 2001, a ten year-old boy from Veliki
Trnovac village (Bujanovac municipality) activated a directional
fragmentation mine camouflaged in vegetation, sustaining serious
injuries to the head and upper part of his body;[48] and, on 13 October
2001, an Albanian farmer was killed by a directional fragmentation mine
while collecting wood near Veliki Trnovac village. His 16-year-old son
was seriously injured in the same incident.[49]
SURVIVOR ASSISTANCE
The FRY formerly had well-developed surgical and
rehabilitation services for mine survivors, as well as reintegration
programs.[50] However, the economic situation has hurt the quality of
health care services. People injured by mines or UXO receive immediate
medical care in hospitals. During 2001, the ICRC donated emergency
surgical kits to major hospital in the FRY, including Vranje, KBC Nis,
Military Hospital Nis, Emergency Center Belgrade, and KBC Zvezdara
Belgrade. The ICRC health program in southern Serbia included training
for medical staff from mobile clinics and ambulance teams.[51]
Handicap International (HI) assists persons with
disabilities, including landmine survivors, in southern Serbia.[52] HI
supports partner organizations, including NGOs and associations for the
disabled, with medical and orthopedic equipment and training. HI also
provides psychosocial support and finances micro-credit programs for
disabled persons.[53] In February 2001, HI signed a Memorandum of
Understanding with the Serbian Ministry of Social Affairs, and is now an
official partner of the State in the process of reforms and creation of
a new policy addressing the needs of persons with disabilities.[54]
Since receiving 40 mine survivors in 1999, the
Institute for Orthopedics and Prosthetics in Belgrade has made no
prostheses for members of the Yugoslav Army or Serbian police injured in
southern Serbia due to a lack of funds, and has received no other
patients injured by landmines or UXO. The Institute received no funds or
other assistance in 2001 or early 2002.[55]
DISABILITY POLICY AND PRACTICE
A study by the Institute of Public Health of Serbia,
in cooperation with WHO and UNICEF, reported that 62.5 percent of
participants surveyed could not afford expenses for health care and
medication.[56] In December 2001, the Serbian Ministry of Health
facilitated an interagency health coordination meeting, which signaled
its intent to lead international agencies in helping to improve the
health status of the population. Monthly coordination meetings are
planned for 2002.[57]
On 3 December 2001, International Day of Disabled
Persons, a series of events were held in FRY to focus public attention
on disability issues. The events focused on bringing persons with
disabilities into mainstream society and using community resources to
improve the situation of individuals and families living with
disabilities. A follow up seminar was held on 7 December and included
topics such as equal opportunities for persons with disabilities, access
to education and psychosocial support, and lower prices for orthopedic
devices. On 17 December, it was announced by the Finance Minister that
as from 1 January 2002, the 20 percent tax on medicine, blood, and
devices for the physically disabled would be abolished.[58]
Footnotes:
[1] In March 2002 it was announced that the Federal
Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) will be dissolved and replaced by the new
nation of Serbia and Montenegro. The Serbian, Montenegrin and Yugoslav
federal parliaments ratified this decision by the end of May 2002.
[2] Interview with Dušanka Divjak-Tomic, Director,
Department for Disarmament, Arms Control and Military Aspects of
Security, Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Belgrade, 13 April 2002.
[3] "Tri žrtve svakog dana" ("Three Victims Each
Day"), interview with Daniel Livermore, Danas (daily newspaper), 2-3
February 2002 (double issue), pp. viii-ix.
[4] Report of the Permanent Mission of the Federal
Republic of Yugoslavia to the OSCE, 4 March 2002, pp. 2-4.
[5] D. Dragic, "Ni Beograd nije sasvim bezbedan"
("Even Belgrade is Not Safe Enough"), Politika (daily newspaper), 7 June
2001, p. 13; I. S., "Skup proces razminiranja" ("Expensive Process of
Demining"), Glas javnosti (daily newspaper), 7 June 2001, p. 6; "Ka
svetu bez mina" ("Toward the Mine Free World"), Danas, 7 June 2001, p.
4.
[6] "Yugoslavia Finally Against Mines," Helsinki
Committee for Human Rights in Serbia, Belgrade, 24 September 2001. The
representatives were Colonel Milomir Manojlovic and Colonel Branko
Boškovic. Colonel Boškovic expressed similar views in a series of
articles in a military journal, and the argument was repeated in an
April 2002 assessment of the Army's combat-readiness. "Naša Vojska
garant mira?" ("Our Army a Guarantor of Peace?"), Vojska (weekly
magazine of the Yugoslav Army General Staff), No. 531, 4 April 2002.
[7] "Overview of Capability Reports", Reay Group on
Mine Action, Working Table III (Security Issues), Stability Pact for
South-East Europe, 17 October 2001, p. 6.
[8] It was represented by Dušanka Divjak-Tomic,
Minister Plenipotentiary, Director, Department for International
Military Organizations, Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and
Lieutenant-Colonel Miodrag Popovic, Ministry of Defense.
[9] Speech by Dušanka Divjak-Tomic, Minister
Plenipotentiary, Director, Department for International Military
Organizations, Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Third Meeting of
States Parties, Managua, Nicaragua, 18-21 September 2001.
[10] It was represented by Dušanka Divjak-Tomic,
Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
[11] Report of the Permanent Mission of the Federal
Republic of Yugoslavia to the OSCE, 4 March 2002, p. 3. For details of
mines produced and likely to be in stockpiles, see Landmine Monitor
Report 1999, pp. 827-829.
[12] Interviews with Col. Milomir Manojlovic, Engineer
Department, General Staff of the Yugoslav Army, 2 and 6 June 2001, with
Col. Branko Boškovic, Institute of Military Skills, General Staff, 6
June 2001, and with Lt.-Col. Miodrag Popovic, Engineer Department,
General Staff, 17 December 2001. The Stability Pact mission also
reported that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated that production had
ceased in 1992.
[13] Landmine Monitor notes, Standing Committee on
Stockpile Destruction, Geneva, 30 May 2002.
[14] "Overview of Capability Reports," Reay Group on
Mine Action, Working Table III (Security Issues), Stability Pact for
South-East Europe, 17 October 2001, pp. 5-6.
[15] Interview with Dusanka Divjak-Tomic, Ministry of
Foreign Affairs, Belgrade, 13 April 2002.
[16] See Landmine Monitor Report 2001, pp. 923-924.
[17] Col. Radoslav Mijailovic, "Mine na putevima"
(Mines on Roads), Vojska, 17 May 2001, p. 12.
[18] UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian
Affairs, "UN Interagency Progress Report and Recommendations on the
Situation in Southern Serbia, FRY," 29 January 2002, pp. 1-2. This
report states that "the violence was brought to an end" in May-June
2001. However, it adds that: "At least six serious incidents occurred
between August 2001 and January 2002 in which unknown persons attacked
police targets or civilians.... Two new Albanian armed groups claimed to
have organized in Southern Serbia or its hinterland in Kosovo." The
report does not state if these incidents involved the use of mines, but
does refer to the "risks remaining" from landmines and UXO.
[19] Report from the Ministry for Internal Affairs,
signed by Minister Dušan Mihajlovic, 8 March 2002.
[20] Ibid.
[21] "Arms Cache-Balkan Briefs," Kathimerini (English
language Greek newspaper, internet edition), 25 July 2002.
[22] Interview with Lt.-Col. Miodrag Popovic, Engineer
Department, General Staff, Yugoslav Army, 17 December 2001.
[23] Report of the Permanent Mission of the Federal
Republic of Yugoslavia to the OSCE, 4 March 2002, p. 4.
[24] "Overview of Capability Reports," Reay Group on
Mine Action, Working Table III (Security Issues), Stability Pact for
South-East Europe, 17 October 2001, p. 8/65.
[25] Ibid., p. 6.
[26] Report of the Federal Ministry of Foreign
Affairs, signed by Dušanka Divjak-Tomic, 13 April 2002.
[27] "NATO Demilitarization Projects," Steve Brown,
Senior Technical Officer, Ammunition Section, Special Projects Program,
NATO Maintenance and Supply Agency, Presentation to the Standing
Committee on Stockpile Destruction, Geneva, 30 May 2002. Notes taken by
Landmine Monitor.
[28] See Landmine Monitor Report 2001, pp. 925-926.
[29] Report of the Permanent Mission of the Federal
Republic of Yugoslavia to the OSCE, 4 March 2002, p. 3; "Overview of
Capability Reports," Reay Group on Mine Action, Working Table III
(Security Issues), Stability Pact for South-East Europe, 17 October
2001, p. 8/65.
[30] UNOCHA, "UN Interagency Progress Report and
Recommendations on the Situation in Southern Serbia, FRY," 29 January
2002, p. 3.
[31] Report of the Federal Ministry of Foreign
Affairs, signed by Dušanka Divjak-Tomic, 13 April 2002.
[32] ITF, "Annual Report 2001," p. 36.
[33] "ITF Spreads its Operations to the Federal
Republic of Yugoslavia," ITF Newsletter, No. 6, July 2001, p. 6; ITF,
"Annual Report 2001," p. 24.
[34] Interview with Stefano Calabretta, INTERSOS,
Rome, 20 February 2001, and emailed questionnaire.
[35] "Memorandum of Understanding Signed with the
Federal Republic of Yugoslavia," ITF Newsletter, No. 7, December 2001,
p. 7. It was signed by the ITF Director and Prvoslav Davinic, FRY
National Coordinator of Table II of the Stability Pact for South East
Europe.
[36] Report from the Ministry for Internal Affairs,
signed by Minister Dusan Mihajlovic, 8 March 2002. Exchange rates at 1
December 2001: DM1 = US$0.449, and at 29 April 2002: ?1 = US$0.898, used
throughout this report.
[37] Report of the Federal Ministry of Foreign
Affairs, signed by Dušanka Divjak-Tomic, 13 April 2002.
[38] Ibid.
[39] Interview with Lt.-Col. Miodrag Popovic, Engineer
Department, General Staff, Yugoslav Army, 17 December 2001.
[40] UNOCHA, "UN Interagency Progress Report and
Recommendations on the Situation in Southern Serbia, FRY," 29 January
2002, p. 3.
[41] "Yugoslavia: ICRC Steps up Mine-Awareness
Campaign," ICRC News, No. 25, 28 June 2001; "ICRC Activities in the FR
of Yugoslavia, Update Jan 2001," 8 February 2002.
[42] Report from Belgrade office of Médecins sans
Frontières, June 2001, sent by Stefan Adriansens on 18 March
2002.
[43] Telephone interview with Jean Pletinckx,
MSF-Belgium, 1 August 2002.
[44] Report from the Ministry for Internal Affairs,
signed by Minister Dusan Mihajlovic, 8 March 2002.
[45] ICRC, "ICRC Mine/UXO Awareness Programmes: Mine
Incidents in South East Europe," 28 January 2002, accessed at
www.reliefweb.int on 18 February 2002.
[46] UNOCHA, "UN Interagency Progress Report and
Recommendations on the Situation in Southern Serbia, FRY", 29 January
2002, p. 5.
[47] "Vojnik teško povredjen" ("Soldier Seriously
Injured"), Danas, 2 June 2001, p. 5.
[48] "Decak teško povredjen od mine" ("Boy Seriously
Injured by Mine"), Danas, 21 August 2001, p. 4.
[49] "Otac poginuo, sin teško ranjen" ("Father Killed,
Son Seriously Injured"), Politika, 14 October 2001, p. 7; "Mine
Explosion Kills Ethnic Albanian in Southern Serbia," Agence France
Presse, 13 October 2001.
[50] See Landmine Monitor Report 1999, pp. 834-836.
[51] World Health Organization, "Health Action in the
Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, November-December 2001," 12 January
2002, accessed at www.reliefweb.int on 10 May 2002.
[52] Interview with Vladimir Citakovic, Handicap
International, Belgrade, 17 December 2001.
[53] "Handicap International Review of Activities:
2001," pp. 150-155.
[54] Handicap International, "Annual Program
Implementation Plan: Mission in Serbia - Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
2002," p. 3.
[55] Interview with Dr. Slavica Eremic, Director of
the Institute for Orthopedics and Prosthetics, Belgrade, 11 April 2002.
[56] The study was conducted in June and July 2000,
and included 17,000 citizens of all age groups. UNOCHA, "OCHA Belgrade:
Humanitarian Situation Report 21 December - 31 January 2002," 31 January
2002, accessed at www.reliefweb.int on 10 May 2002.
[57] World Health Organization, "Health Action in the
Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, November-December 2001," 12 January
2002, accessed at www.reliefweb.int on 10 May 2002.
[58] Ibid.
Marijana Obradovic |