Florence
Hartmann indicted; Hague Tribunal tries to silence a whistleblower
3. September 2008, HCHRS
Florence Hartmann, former spokeswoman for ICTY chief
prosecutor Carla del Ponte, was last week indicted by the ICTY, on the
charge of contempt of court, for allegedly disclosing classified
information relating to the proceedings against Slobodan Milosevic. This
information was allegedly published in her book, Peace and Punishment
(Paix et chatiment) and in an article published on the website of the
Bosnian Institute. Hartmann has rejected the charges, arguing that she
has not revealed confidential information, but only information she had
gathered through her work as a journalist, and that her indictment
represents a blow by the Office of the Prosecutor against free speech
and transparency. She has pledged to fight the charges.
Hartmann is the first Western citizen without roots in
the former Yugoslavia, and the first former ICTY official to be indicted
by the Tribunal. As she points out, her book was published a year ago,
while the Bosnian Institute article was published in January, making the
delay in the issuing of her indictment peculiar. The charges refer to a
case that is no longer actual, and cannot be motivated by any desire to
ensure the proper functioning of the proceedings. The indictment
appears, indeed, to be an attempt to muzzle a whistleblower who has
revealed information about the internal politics and incompetence within
the Tribunal, and a warning to other former Tribunal officials who might
be tempted to reveal more such information.
The ICTY is a highly flawed institution with a very
patchy record; badly organised, filled with many incompetent
apparatchiks alongside some committed professionals, riven with internal
factionalism and corrupted by political pressures both external and
self-induced, it has failed to deliver justice to the peoples of the
former Yugoslavia. I am myself a former official of the Tribunal, and my
biggest criticism of it has been its failure to indict most of the
principal Serbian and Montenegrin war-criminals, a failure that, on the
basis of my eyewitness experience, I attribute in large part to the poor
strategy of del Ponte as Chief Prosecutor. But a perhaps even more
shameful failing on the Tribunal's part was the one about which Florence
writes: the decision of the judges in the Milosevic case to allow
Serbia, when submitting to the Tribunal the minutes of the 'Supreme
Defence Council' of the former Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, to censor
parts of it in the version that was made public. As Florence argues, it
was thanks to the Tribunal's collusion with Serbia in the suppression of
this crucial piece of evidence, that Bosnia was not able to draw upon
the latter in its case against Serbia for genocide at the International
Court of Justice, leading to Serbia's unjustified acquittal. Far from
punishing the perpetrators of genocide in the former Yugoslavia, the
Tribunal has helped to shield them (NB to date, only one individual, a
lowly deputy corps commander of the Bosnian Serb army, has been
successfully prosecuted for a genocide-related offence by the ICTY,
while not a single official from Serbia has yet been convicted of any
war-crime in Bosnia whatsoever).
The Tribunal may or may not have a legal case against
Hartmann. What is certain, however, is that Hartmann was acting in the
public interest in revealing the information she did. The people of the
former Yugoslavia have a right to know why they have not received much
in the way of justice from the ICTY, while the citizens of the world
have a right to know why this UN court, funded by their taxes, has
produced such poor results. Public interest would best be served if more
former Tribunal officials showed as much principle and courage as
Florence, and came forward with more insider information so that we can
better understand this whole, sorry story. This would help to ensure
that other international courts could avoid the ICTY's mistakes. But we
are all aware that there is a risk: I myself, after being interviewed
about the ICTY by the Croatian journalist Domagoj Margetic last year,
received a threatening letter from the Tribunal, warning me that I had,
when taking up the post back in 2001, signed a declaration promising to
respect the Tribunal's confidentiality (Florence, too, apparently
received such a letter when she first began publicly to speak about the
ICTY). Although I did not take this threat seriously at the time, it
appears my complacency has been misguided.
Florence is a brave, principled and committed
individual who has done more than anyone to reveal the extent to which
the international community and the international courts have betrayed
the cause of justice for the former Yugoslavia. Although I disagree with
some of what she says in her book, it is nevertheless a splendid, daming
critique of this betrayal, and her accusations of Western complicity in
Radovan Karadzic's evasion of arrest for thirteen years have been
essentially vindicated; I would recommend anyone interested in the
subject to read it. Florence is fighting the battle for truth on behalf
of all the victims of the wars in the former Yugoslavia, and all present
and future historians. We are 100% on her side. |